Written By Ophelia
Sept. 6, 2019, 3:45 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Luca
Love and miss you, brother. I hope I continue to make you proud.
Written By Selene
Sept. 6, 2019, 3:04 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
Written By Shard
Sept. 6, 2019, 2:56 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Marian
Written By Rinel
Sept. 6, 2019, 2:33 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Preston
I would not accuse the Grandmaster of furthering the evils contained within the heart of the Dominus Fawkhul, whose status as Godsworn proved no defense against the corruption of the world--and I would respectfully ask that he refrain from making such insinuations regarding my charity towards the Goodman Elisha, which, as stated now multiple times by the Shepherd of the Faith, is in no way a violation of our Faith's sacred laws.
Having dispensed with the authoritative issues regarding this matter, if the Grandmaster wishes to raise substantive claims of /theology/ regarding the showing of Gildian charity to those who preach views against the Pantheon, I am more than willing to write on the subject. Yet I think this an endeavour that it will not avail Grandmaster but poorly to pursue--for it was our own Faith who extended holy guest right to the emissaries of the Skykingdom of Cardia, which proclaims its masters equal to our Gods, and it was our own Faith which permitted these emissaries, along with the emissaries of the so-called "Immortal Empire" of Jaidairal, to preach their pagan ways to the faithful of the Compact.
I am a child of the Faith, and obedient to its laws. I will not swerve from what is right and allowed by the Church, whether opposition come by threats of execution, attempts at public shame, or otherwise. I am intimately acquainted with the rigidity of the Orthodox. It has led me into error countless times. I have seen the flexibility of Liberalism draw the late Driskell, Godsworn and Prelate of the Scholars, into heresy and death. And history has shown us that even a Dominus may at times be susceptible to the darkness of the world.
In support whereof I offer this quote, well known to those familiar with the Faith of the Oathlands: "We cannot build the foundations of faith by shaking them. We cannot build a world of hope by instilling doubt. We cannot demand honor while suggesting dishonorable methods. I will not see the Faith corrupted. I declare the Dominus Marach's teachings an apostasy, and demand that they be destroyed."
If I have obtained any wisdom through my follies and my penance, it is that no path of Faith grants immunity to the dangers of temptation--and that no human, be they laity, Godsworn, or the Most Holy Themselves, is free from the possibility of a fall.
Written By Sparte
Sept. 6, 2019, 1:45 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
What a curious phrase when you think about it. As if the coin itself was no longer welcome as currency.
I wonder if any coins ever /have/ been excommunicated? Perhaps some with the faces of rulers who were deemed terrible, like Kinsbane. Perhaps the only person to be so shunned in modern society was Abbas, but no coins I know of ever bore his likeness to know how they would be treated.
That would be an odd thing to find one day. A cache of coins none could spend because the mark upon them was so reviled. A sort of fool's gold.
Though, memories are shorter than they should be. Greed is a powerful force, and a melted coin looks no different from any other. I doubt many such coins would have survived to today, if ever there were any at all.
Written By Saoirse
Sept. 6, 2019, 12:44 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
Written By Lisebet
Sept. 6, 2019, 12:11 p.m.(10/14/1011 AR)
Written By Bhandn
Sept. 6, 2019, 4:17 a.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
There is so much I still do not understand, and yet I feel like the only way to compensate for that is to run myself to exhaustion every day. What purpose does it serve to exhaust my mind that way, though? I do not write this to say that there is no point in increasing my knowledge and understanding of these past years, but at times it seems that is all that happens every day: I learn, but not /do/. I'm old, but I am not a fucking invalid, and yet compared to so many people I might as well be.
A bitter taste, and with very little to sweeten it.
Written By Preston
Sept. 6, 2019, 4:13 a.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Shard
And again, I emphasise that what I said were my views and those of my background. As others point out, we cannot speak for the Crown and would not speak for the Crown. There is the law of the Gods that applies everywhere, there is the law of the Church will applies in our holy places and governs the business of the Faith and those who work for us, there is Arvani law which applies to all the compact. The Faith gave up its rights over exile long ago to the Crown, and we would not seek them back. But it does not change the seriousness to us of this sanction.
I also must emphasise, as I said before, you can sustain the excommunicated. That is your choice. We all have them. There is only an actual problem where that might drift into sustaining his ideas. My point was however that if you sustain such a person without pushing them to repentance, or sustain them and otherwise bring suspicion that you do not condemn their views, that those of the Faith are free to consider if you are truly a friend of the Faith, and that actually if you are not pushing them to repentance you may be helping them feel confident to remain outside of the Faith and so further harming them by allowing them not to repent.
As for your question on actions, I thought I was clear on this but I'll say it again too, the excommunicated can make no oaths, can give no confidence to others. You, however, made your oaths to obey the Compact, it's rules, it's laws, to obey the instructions of the Gods. His actions do not free you from those obligations, you did not make them to him. And the same is true for others. The only way someone can be placed outside of the protection of the Compact, and so vulnerable in the way you suggest to random killing, is through the powers of the King and those he delegates to - though you would still have obedience to the law of the Gods in that situation. If you had sworn to Limerance not to harm them, or if you had provided Guest Right under Gild? Then you would be bound by that, the King cannot release you from those obligations, only the Gods through the Dominus.
Written By Marian
Sept. 6, 2019, 2:29 a.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Shard
Nor is there any connection between those Abandoned, choosing to live outside the Compact and a heretic that rejects the teachings of the Faith. Rejecting sovereignty does not mean one is faithless just as rejecting Faith does not make one outlaw. Can a poor fool fall so off the path to do both, I imagine it's possible. Certainly not advisable under any circumstances.
Don't blur the lines here by suggesting excommunication makes it permissible to commit murder. Regardless of the decisions of a heretic, citizens of Arx can not commit murder without consequences. This decision by the Faith does not invite harm on this heretic. There is no glory in lashing out at the mentally ill. I would only bear arms against a heretic if the lives of citizens of this Compact were in danger.
There are consequences to rejecting sovereignty. Just as there are consequences in heresy. Both paths can circle back to redemption, one in bending on knee to rejoin the Compact as the other requires repentance to the Church. Both circumstances allow for choices. I do not pity others for their choices taken freely. Or criticize others for enforcing consquences.
Written By Skye
Sept. 6, 2019, 12:35 a.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
It was Faith in my cousin's reputation that allowed that captain to bring me to Arx on promise of payment when I had no obvious means of paying for an additional passage. He offered charity to this heartbroken child-women and gave me shelter, delivering me to House Navegant. Yes, in the end, he was paid beyond the cost of my fare. However, in that moment, he had choices and I am fortunate to have booked passage with a good man.
My cousin paid that sea captain and took me into his home on Faith that I was Lady Skye Blackshore. Of course he verified my origins like any sane head of house would do. However, those first couple of days were filled with generosity and kindness with only Faith to guide his charity. So please understand that I know full well the value of charity. I spend time with those in the Lowers, giving charity at the clinic as a way to pass this generosity on.
I cannot in Faith give succour to a heretic. I refuse to trade or promote commerce with those who twist scripture or promote a break from the gods. I trust those Godsworn to carry the mantle, and uphold the gods in principle to the best to my ability. I shall not offer charity to those who live outside the Church, because I do not want to fall from the path or be deceived into taking false words as truth. I shall include these lost men in my prayers and hope in time they seek repentance for their actions. I have Faith that the Godsworn will do everything in their power help those who repent. Far better than I could hope to do on my own. No judgement is given against those that offer charity to a heretic. This is not meant to condemn those that do. I have no wish to take such risks when my Faith has seen me through so much.
Written By Kaia
Sept. 5, 2019, 11:10 p.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
Aside from the odd and perhaps even a little unsettling company from an elf; I must say, the costumes were spectacular!
The Phoenix in particular with its amazing dynamic wings, I dare say, was the center of attention! Followed quite closely by the ever shinning and bright Sun, and a Skull. My most loving and sincere congratulations to all three of them!
Written By Saoirse
Sept. 5, 2019, 11:08 p.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
Written By Esme
Sept. 5, 2019, 10:55 p.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Bree
Written By Lysander
Sept. 5, 2019, 10:18 p.m.(10/13/1011 AR)
Written By Aureth
Sept. 5, 2019, 8 p.m.(10/12/1011 AR)
Written By Octavia
Sept. 5, 2019, 6:47 p.m.(10/12/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Peri
Elisha may remain in the city. He may travel to the Lowers and seek an unscrupulous merchant who will sell to him. He may cast himself upon the charity of those who would not see him starve. That is his right, as he is not an outlaw. The Grandmaster of the Knights Templar can rattle his sword, and the Legates and Dominus can call upon him to repent and others to turn their face from heresy, but until Elisha Baseborn is charged by the Crown Court or the Inquisition with a crime punishable by exile or death, he can walk freely in the city.
Written By Shard
Sept. 5, 2019, 6:32 p.m.(10/12/1011 AR)
Relationship Note on Preston
If the intent was just to kill him slowly, or force him to start stealing in order to survive (so that he could then be punished for that too), then you might as well take his head off now, it will save time. I somehow doubt that's the case.
He's not Abandoned; he's still in the city for one thing. Is it legal for someone to do whatever they want to him now? Can I just walk up and murder him in the street because his unending fucking nonsense annoys me? The last time that happened the killer at least pretended it was in self defense, so I don't think that's the case either.
Slow starvation isn't a good way to convince someone you're right. It's just a good way to break them into saying whatever you want them to say so they can eat, regardless of what they feel or believe. Those are not the same things at all.
Written By Elloise
Sept. 5, 2019, 6:11 p.m.(10/12/1011 AR)
Today I wondered what would happen if I shaved some granite stones into a flask of acids. The stone was eroded. That is all.
Written By Aureth
Sept. 5, 2019, 4:50 p.m.(10/12/1011 AR)
The Church cannot give succor and aid to the faithless and will turn away the heretic upon our stoop, not out of cruelty but because we must. But for a human to look upon another human being in need and say, let me help you, there is nothing unrighteous to be found there.
Should the heretic's words be heeded, his blasphemy countenanced or his falsehoods be spread, naturally that conversation is an entirely different one. But happily, not one before me.
Should you look upon the excommunicate who has defied the Faith and say, no, I feel no pity for he that has forsaken the path, that too is acceptable.
The Faith does not require either choice. Only that you know that this is an excommunicate, defiant of what is holy, whose calumny will not be permitted to stand, who is cast out from the Church he defies.
With this knowledge, go forth and do as you will.
Please note that the scholars may take some time preparing your journal for others to read.